NGD: Tom Anderson Guardian Angel Player

OrganicZed

Shredder
Messages
1,038
My Tom Anderson build arrived this past Saturday evening.

1751502629090.jpeg

1751502714181.jpeg

1751502651547.jpeg

1751502668974.jpeg


Review:

Body: As requested on my build sheet, the crew at TAG selected a lightweight alder body blank. The guitar weighs a comfortable 7.3 Lbs and balances well on the strap or when playing in a seated position. The Angel body shape has large cutaways providing ample upper fretboard access. The arm carve, belly cut, rounded body edges, and sculpted neck heel work together for an unobstructed playing experience. The sparkle plum finish is absolutely spectacular. It turned out exactly as I was hoping for with a rich purple hue that varies in appearance from almost black in low light to a true plum in direct sunlight. Pictures don't fully capture the visual impact of this finish. The metallic flake makes the guitar glisten as light moves across it. I made a video (below) to more fully convey how it looks in person. I rate the finish a 10/10, highly recommended.



Hardware: The Anderson branded locking tuners operate smoothly and lock securely with the back mounted knurled knobs. The pickup switches operate with a solid tactile feel while not being overly stiff. The volume and tone knobs move smoothly through their entire range with not a hint of audible crackle. The matte black pickguard is precisely cut and it conforms closely to the body and pickups. I believe that Anderson cuts all of their pickguards on a laser it shows. The fit is perfect. It has no bowing or areas that flex or creak when touched.

The neck pickup is seated such that it is nearly touching the end of the fretboard. This is a good thing in my opinion because it allows for the neck pickup to be positioned as close as possible to the position where it would sit on a traditional Strat design. The satin finish on the bridge pickup looks and feels nice without being a fingerprint magnet like the polished covers on my 2024 build are. The cover arrived with a few pinhead sized specks of rust, so I suspect that the rougher surface finish of the cover might be prone to oxidize further. A minor flaw / oversight that I noticed was the presence of some metal filings on the neck and middle pickup pole pieces. I suspect that steel wool was used in the fret finishing process and the pickups grabbed some of the resulting metallic dust. I was able to remove the dust from the pickups using some electrical tape, so not a big deal.

The non-fine tuner Floyd Rose is a solid unit that has no hot spots or sharp edges to irritate the picking hand. The bar is mounted by pushing it through a plastic collar and then it threads onto the bridge directly. The tension of the collar can be adjusted with a grub screw to allow the bar to either swing freely or stay in place depending on user preference. The bar has no play before engaging so the result is a responsive vibrato feel. Since this bridge is fully recess mounted, the range is greater than what you get with a floating top mounted setup. It does not have quite the range nor is it as quick to respond as a full double locking setup though because the length of the strings behind the nut are still in play. Tuning stability with vibrato is good but not perfect. That was also the case for my other Anderson with this bridge. It took about a month of playing for that one to settle in and now it is totally stable even with heavy vibrato use. I expect that this guitar will also settle in and become similarly stable.

Update: A dose of Big Bends Nut sauce on the underside of the string tree resolved the tuning stability concern.

Neck: The even taper -0.020 roasted maple neck carve feels identical to my 2024 Anderson with the same profile. The satin finish has a low friction feel that is smooth to the touch without being sticky (like some gloss finished necks can be). The rosewood board is a warm brown hue with highlights of red and dark brown running the length that compliment the purple finish well. The edges of the board are rounded. The neck pocket is precisely fitted with no gaps between the neck and the body. The Tusq nut fills the slot perfectly in every dimension, has rounded edges, and the slots are cut with just the right depth to allow for cleanly ringing open notes and comfortable first position chording.

The ends of the jumbo stainless steel frets are smooth and the frets polished to a mirrored finish. To my surprise and disappointment, the frets on this guitar did not pass inspection with a fret rocker. I found areas of concern on frets 2, 4, 7, 13, and 22. I discovered that the frets weren't properly level when I adjusted the action. The guitar arrived with the action at 1.3mm at the 12th fret (1.7mm at the 24th fret) and 0.010 in of relief at the 7th fret. The guitar played cleanly across the whole neck (good sustain, no fret buzz or dead notes) with the factory setup, but it was stiffer than I'm used to. I straightened the neck (0.0055 in of relief) and dialed in the action to 1.25 mm measured at the 12th fret (1.6 mm at the 24th fret). After lowering the action the guitar exhibited fret buzz mostly in the range of frets 6-12 that was significant enough to be audible through a clean amp. Those same notes rang clearly when played with approximately the same picking intensity on my most similar guitar (2022 Tom Anderson Angel setup with an action of 1.4 mm at the 24th fret and 0.0055 in of relief).

I emailed support and Anderson Guitarworks co-owner Markus Spohn responded within a few hours confirming that they provide a lifetime warranty on the neck and fretwork. Arrangements have been made for me to send the guitar back to Anderson so they can diagnose and correct the issue. It sucks that I have to send my new guitar back. On the positive side, I have full confidence that they will resolve the matter to my satisfaction and make the guitar play as well as my other Andersons.

Update: See post #12 below for the post-warranty work update. Anderson did another fret level and the fretwork is great now.

Tones:

I am really enjoying the sound of the VA7 single coils. They have the sparkle, chime, and snap you would expect from a Strat while somehow not being harsh. Compared to the other Strat style single coils I have, they are similarly bright and clear like the Suhr V60 pickups but with a smoother top end. The VA7's have more top end than the Suhr V60LP pickups which helps them sound great with clean tones. They are much more traditional sounding than the Anderson SF1 (which is more round sounding and has more output). The V-quiet system is effective and I can only hear the faintest 60-cycle hum when listening to the ambient noise of the guitar through a gained up Plexi preset on the Axe-FX III with no noise gate. I would say that the Suhr SSCII is a bit more effective at removing single coil hum, but the V-quiet system is close.

The HC2+ bridge humbucker has plenty of output and a big warm sound. The top end is soft, the mids are forward, and the low end is round and punchy without sounding bloated. Dialing in a rhythm tone for the neck pickup and then switching to the bridge pickup provides a fat and powerful lead tone. The split sound is convincing as a lower output single coil and it balances well with the VA7 pickups. I especially like the tone I get with the combination of neck pickup and the split HC2+ for rhythm playing. This is the default selection with the switch in position 3. Alternatively, I can access the middle single coil pickup by pulling the tone control with the switch in position 3. Surprisingly, I actually like how this middle pickup sounds on its own. That's the one setting that I don't like on my other HSS and HSH guitars. I did the direct comparison against the middle pickup on the Suhr Classic S (V60LP) and the Suhr Standard (V60) with the same amp settings and the VA7 middle pickup is a much more pleasant and usable sound. Tonally, this guitar fulfills my goal of sounding like my idealized super Strat; vintage strat tones on the neck and middle pickups and a medium hot bridge pickup for lead and heavy rhythm work.

Setting aside my disappointment with the subpar fret work, I am happy with how the build turned out. It looks incredible and it delivers the tones I was after. I will of course provide an update to the review once the warranty work has been done.

Update 09/16/25: I've had this guitar back in my hands for just about a month now and have been very impressed with it. It now plays flawlessly. The single coil tones are my favorite of any of my strat style guitars and I think I have discovered why. Since this is a 24 fret guitar, the neck single coil is placed closer to the bridge than on a typical 21 or 22 fret strat. That yields a more balanced tone relative to the bridge pickup making it easier to dial in tones that works for both pickups. Also, Anderson chose to place the middle single coil closer to the bridge which makes the neck / middle combination maintain the quack. There isn't a bad sound in this instrument.
 
Last edited:
Very beautiful guitar, huge congrats!

Sorry you have to send it back, I'd be a little irate, too - but shit happens! Don't let it stop you from loving it long time! :banana :chef :pickle
Stuff slips through the cracks even at the very best shops. I own five Suhr guitars and two them have been back to the factory for warranty repair work. What really matters is working with a company that cares about the end product and is willing to make it right.
 
Last edited:
Damn, a lifetime warranty on anything related to a guitar is impressive in itself. I’d hope that’d give even the most pessimistic of people some solace!

While sending it back is a bummer, that’s a minor bit of work and chances are they’ll ensure you can’t find anything to be unhappy about when ya get it back and then you’ll have an absolutely badass guitar!!!

Congrats (mostly)!!!
 
Gorgeous axe. Awesome that they're accommodating you. Stuff like that gets overlooked when discussing value on high end instruments!
 
Last edited:
Update:

TLDR, the guitar is back and now has excellent fretwork. My concerns have been fully addressed.

The long version:

The guitar went back to Anderson for reevaluation. Markus (co-owner of TAG) told me that both he and Tom Anderson played the guitar through their test rigs again as they do before shipping every guitar. Neither of them thought that it was particularly buzzy or was in need obvious need of fretwork. Markus told me that he then purchased a StewMac fret rocker to see if he could reproduce what I was seeing with mine. He said that he was able to observe movement of the fret rocker across multiple frets as I had reported, but he also noticed that the reproducibility of the finding was dependent on the positioning of the fret rocker itself. He checked the trueness of the fret rocker against their precision surface plate and found that the fret rocker he had received was not properly trued by StewMac. His conclusion was that these types of tools are not worth the money because they are rarely accurate enough to properly evaluate fretwork (which is why he didn't have one in the shop in the first place).

They decided to give the frets a light leveling regardless, just to make certain that it was done properly. The thought was also that the leveling process itself would reveal if there had been an issue with the fretwork in the first place. Markus reported back that the leveling process didn't reveal any issues.

I received the guitar back from Anderson at the end of last week. To my ear, it is much better than before the extra bit of fret leveling. I could tell within just a few minutes of playing the guitar that the fret level had improved. I could perceive no fret buzz or across the entire board.

The factory action is a bit higher than I like, so I dropped it down to 1.47 mm on the bass and 1.45 mm on the treble side (measured at the 24th fret) and the guitar now plays superbly. I can play with my full dynamic range of picking without a hint of fret buzz audible through a totally clean amp tone.

To satisfy my own curiosity about the validity of the fret rocker analysis, I decided to do the fret rocker analysis on the neck just as I had done before shipping it to Anderson for warranty work. I did not look back at the previous analysis data prior to doing the new analysis. I didn't care what the results were since it now plays to my standards, I just wanted to see if I could observe a difference or not since both Tom and Markus said that they didn't find an issue.

The areas in green indicate no movement of the fret rocker when centered on that fret. Areas in yellow correspond to minimal movement of the fret rocker when centered on that particular fret. The areas in orange and red correspond to the areas where the fret rocker movement was significant enough for me to fit a feeler gauge between the fret rocker and an adjacent fret while the fret rocker was centered on that fret.

As received in June:

1755613139805.png

After the warranty work:

1755613179372.png


As you can see, the results correlate well with the improvement I perceived upon playing the guitar. I don't know why they couldn't hear the fret buzz that I was hearing and I was surprised when they reported back that the fret level didn't reveal any issues. I'd be curious to see what @Eagle thinks.

I want to emphasize that I really appreciate that Tom and Markus took my concerns seriously. They shipped the guitar across the country twice at their expense, took the time to play the instrument, evaluated it with tools similar to what I was using, and even went the extra mile to do another fret level / crown / and polish job despite their opinions being that it played pretty cleanly through their own rigs. They communicated with me regularly though the process in a courteous and transparent manner. The end result is a guitar that fully meets my expectations and is amongst the best I've ever had the chance to play.
 
Last edited:
Interpretation of a fret rocker isn’t as straightforward is you might think because all it does is tell you what the middle fret is doing compared to the outer two which are not necessarily correct themselves. It can show cumulative errors in a deceptive way unless you also use other methods along side.
Ight under a straight edge can be more informative but both is better still. Sight from the body end is still very effective if you know how to look at it.
 
@Eagle thanks for the insights.

What are your thoughts as to why a guitar might show no fret level issues with a pass of the leveling beam but then guitar plays so much more cleanly afterward?
 
@Eagle thanks for the insights.

What are your thoughts as to why a guitar might show no fret level issues with a pass of the leveling beam but then guitar plays so much more cleanly afterward?
It depends what happens under tension. Sometimes a neck only shows issues with string tension. This is why Plek was invented. Something has changed and without having seen it I can only speculate. My guess is they dressed it.
 
It depends what happens under tension. Sometimes a neck only shows issues with string tension. This is why Plek was invented. Something has changed and without having seen it I can only speculate. My guess is they dressed it.

From what I've seen in factory tour videos (shown and discussed briefly here), they do the fret leveling with the neck off of the body mounted in a vise with a rudimentary neck support. It does not appear to be the type of setup that simulates the neck deflection caused by string tension (which StewMac calls the Erlewine Neck Jig).

This particular guitar has the thinnest neck specification that they offer and may be more prone to distort under tension than the majority of their builds, so I think your hypothesis is pretty plausible.

Edit: I was incorrect. In this video (timestamped) Tom specifically says that they level the fretboard under simulated string tension and they also dress the frets in final setup under simulated string tension.

 
Last edited:
Gorgeous guitar!

I'm a big fan of Tom Anderson guitars. I had a couple in the late '90s, then got hooked on PRS'. But last year I picked up an Anderson T-Icon, a vintage-style Telecaster, and it's a superb guitar.

Yours makes me want to add a sparkly one!

This is my T-Icon, just throwin' it into the thread for grins because who doesn't like ogling guitars? :rofl
 

Attachments

  • 05-10-24N-11__67493.jpg
    05-10-24N-11__67493.jpg
    858.5 KB · Views: 77
Glad you like it; yours is superb! I love that finish. Perfect choice on your pick guard too. Allows the finish to be the star.

I remember getting the Carvin catalogs in the mail as a kid and thinking about all the options I wanted to put on a custom guitar build. My ideal feature set would have been big block abalone fretboard inlays, a flamed maple top with a blue and green burst transparent finish, a birds eye maple fretboard, abalone inlayed volume and tone knobs, gold hardware, a multi-laminate neck... the works!

A few years later I started frequenting guitar forums and saw people posting photos of their new guitars with similar feature lists to what I had imagined. The guitars were hideous. It was then I came to realize that it is best to choose one or maybe two standout visual features for a build and to leave the rest as pedestrian as possible. If you don't restrain yourself when choosing the options the end result will be like the car that Homer Simpson designed:

1755690630049.png
 
Back
Top