"Letter" to Line 6 about Helix Stadium and Acoustic Guitar

Ryan123

Newbie
Messages
6
Digital Igloo (an impressive guy who truly seems to care about Line 6 customers) asked me a question on another forum: "what equipment would you want us to model for acoustic guitar". My initial response was all over the place so I thought I'd try again.

(SIDE NOTE: I tried to post this on the other forum, but apparently posting twice on the same topic triggered some sort of an alarm and they locked my account. I'm trying to sort that out).

Anyway here is my second response:


Digital Igloo:

My initial answer to your question “what equipment would you want us to model for acoustic guitar” was scattered so I thought I’d try again.


Objectives

Today, the process of adding acoustic instruments to a line 6 modeler is not clear.

For electric guitar (I imagine) most people start with an amp or preamp and build out from there. But there are no acoustic amps in Line 6 modelers today so this process does not work for acoustic guitars, and there is limited information on how to proceed.

Below are some ideas on how to improve the situation with these objectives in mind:
  • ensure people know that acoustic instruments are supported
  • make the process of adding an acoustic instrument clear (especially for newer users)
  • make it easier and faster (for players of all levels) to dial in a good tone

1. Learning Tools

There is minimal info on acoustic instruments available from Line 6, and what is labeled as “acoustic” can be confusing.

Searching for the word “acoustic” in the Helix 3.80 manual leads to a bass amp (Woody Blue) and an acoustic sim. At first glance the sim seems like a great starting point for acoustic guitarists but turns out the sim is actually aimed at electric instruments. The only place acoustic guitar is mentioned in the Helix manual is a brief aside under the global EQ section.

The same (confusing) entries for the bass amp and the acoustic sim are also found in the Pod Go 2.0 manual. This manual does have an additional mention of acoustics IR’s under the Cab/IR section but it is just a couple of words and not very helpful.

I search for “acoustic” or “acoustic guitar” on the Line 6 web site you get hits for a couple of IR packages sold in the store and a couple of support responses to various detail questions. No links to the hardware at all.

If I search for “electric” on the Line 6 web site the first hit is the Line 6 Helix models. If you search “electric guitar” these models comes up lower (after Variax) but at least they appear on the first page.

When I search YouTube for “Line 6 acoustic guitar” I find a “Helix Minute” video on acoustic guitars…and that is it. The other top video hits are all about using Variax guitars to simulate acoustic sounds.

I’m sure there is more Line 6 acoustic content somewhere. But the problem is discoverability. People don’t automatically know these videos exist or where to look, and that Helix 1-minute video is - by design - minimal.

It would be nice to have a dedicated “setting up acoustic guitar” entry in the manuals. This entry could talk about IRs, recommend using a multi-band EQ (and give a couple of examples on how you might use one), suggest adding a reverb, and (possibly) suggest a compressor.

A slightly more in-depth Helix video could be made as well, and an additional one for the Pod Go.


2. Modeling of Existing Hardware

Let’s face it - most people just start using a device as soon as they can and only go to manuals or videos as a supplement.

The logical starting point for an electric guitar or bass is to configure an amp or preamp. Then expand out from there. The instinct is to do the same for acoustic guitar; it would be great if this was possible.

If Line 6 wanted to provide acoustic hardware I suggest 2 or 3 popular amps (especially a Fishman) and 2 or 3 popular preamps (these could be pedal preamps). I think that would be plenty.


3. Create a Line 6 acoustic combo amp

A custom Line 6 acoustic amp could be a nice solution, and maybe enough by itself.

Unlike electric guitars, acoustic guitarists are not (normally) chasing the tone and playing feel of a specific amp or cab. Their goal is either a “very good” acoustic sound, or to be as true as possible to the guitar’s native acoustic sound (which is really hard to achieve without using a microphone).

Since “good live acoustic sound” is so often the goal there seems to be opportunity for a generic acoustic amp.

The amp could have a very flat response, but it would include the primary functions an acoustic guitarist should consider using: a multi band EQ (4 knobs maybe?), a single knob reverb, and a single knob compressor. It would be great to also throw in an anti-feedback button.

Next, add a knob (or other control) that selects different sizes of guitar body and string types (nylon, 12 string, and whatever).

As the user moves the control it would adjust the EQ and other parameters, not only giving them a helpful starting point but teaching how to adjust for their instrument. Kind of like focus view on the Helix Stadium does.

An amp like this could be made available on all Line 6 modelers, from the Pod Go up to Stadium XL.

One of the advantages of including acoustic amps (or a single amp) is that the Line 6 modelers would then feel more “ready to use” with acoustic guitars. Right now it almost seems like a requirement to buy an IR in order to use an acoustic.


4. Acoustic IR’s

IR’s are a tricky area.

They are useful with acoustic guitars, and, in the absence of an amp, really valuable. It would be great if Line 6 modelers shipped with a bunch of them, but I can see that doing that may not be practical.

Perhaps a new “setting up for acoustic guitar” section in the manuals could describe the role IR’s play for acoustic guitar, and point to the Line 6 marketplace. Line 6 has done a nice job with the store and it lists a number of acoustic IR packages there.

Line 6 could also make it easier to find and load IRs. Line 6 does an excellent job getting companies to post IRs to there market place - re are currently 3152 Impluse Repsonse SKU’s listed up there - but this is far too many to scroll through. It would be helpful if there were additional selections so you could see just those that apply to acoustic guitar (or bass or electric guitar, etc.).

Once you find and buy one it is not too hard to load it in to a unit. But you could make it extra easy by providing an interface in the unit (or in the Helix HX software) where you could buy and then directly load IRs.

The Fishman Aura pedal is a good example of a pedal that sort of brings all this together, where it both ships with acoustic IR’s, plus it makes it easy to get other IR’s from a library and load them into the device.


Final Caveat

It is clearly possible for people to get great acoustic sound out of a Line 6 modeler today - if you know what you are doing. Lot's of people do, including me: I often play gigs where I use an acoustic guitar going through my Pod Go wireless.

I admit freely I’m not experienced in the use of molders and some (perhaps many) of the things I say may not make sense.

The comments here are really focused on making the process of adding an acoustic and dialing in the sound easier, especially for non-experts.

Finally: I'm impressed with what I've seen online of the Helix Stadium, excited about moving up from my current Pod Go Wireless, and I look forward to integrating the new unit into my band's performances.

Thanks for listening!
 
That’s a lot of text.
You think it is too long for a forum? I wondered about that. I've only posted to a forums a few times ever so I wasn't sure.

Like me, many people successfully run acoustic guitars through Line 6 modelers, but I believe it is harder to configure acoustics "out of the box" than it needs to be. I've seen online questions posted by other users that make me think I'm not alone.

My "letter" was created in response to a question from a senior person (digital igloo) at Line 6 asking what I thought they should add for acoustic guitarists. I'm pretty sure he will want the info, at least I hope so (I spent a lot of time pulling it together). I had considered sending this as a direct message, but when I made my original post in another forum it seemed like people there were interested so I thought I would make this "letter" public. But maybe this response is just too much detail.

I'll send it off via a direct message and avoid any further public posting on this topic.
 
Last edited:
Those are valid asks.

I do think acoustics often don't have a whole lot of love in modelers because you can use the same effects for acoustic - EQs, compressors, and so on. Acoustic amps mainly include these on board but otherwise tend to be pretty straightforward things without huge character to them. So the idea is that you don't need amp models of acoustic amps.

At minimum including some info about using acoustics in the manual, and some acoustic focused presets would be good for HX Stadium.
 
As I've got quite some decent results out of using IRs to enhance acoustic guitar signals (usually picked up by piezo pickups), a great idea for something tailored to acoustic guitar might be something like the latest cab engine with a different UI and (obviously) different IRs under the hood.
It'd also be quite nice if at least somewhat longer IRs could make it into that as it'd allow them to contain a bit more of the body resonances.

In addition, an EQ tailored to easily notch out unwanted harsh spots (which are pretty typical for many piezos) would be welcomed. The same EQ could possibly be used for automatic feedback detection and supression (these things can work amazingly well in a live context).

These would be the things I'd use the most by far. For anything else, I think the general improvements we will see down the road should be fine for acoustic guitars as well (such as better reverbs).
 
IMG_0972.jpeg
 
I've never tagged someone on here, how do you do that? Especially for users with a space in the name. I presume there's some code required.

Type an @ and then the first letters of the name. The rest can usually be autocompleted (there's a pulldown menu coming up magically in case there's multiple options for auto completion). Spaces can be used just the same as letters.
It's really only becoming difficult in case folks are using cryptic signs for their handles, such as Moondog Willy and Brockstar.
 
For me, for acoustic guitar for live performance, especially on a shared stage, I think that the biggest missing things are Feedback Suppression which the M20d did have, so shouldn’t be too hard to add, and a dynamic EQ to pull down over resonant frequencies (similar but not the same).

From a mixing perspective, and something that could be a really useful addition, is a Transient Designer. For acoustic instruments especially they can bring a dull instrument to life or allow a bright one to be pushed back when it is not the star of that section of a song.
 
I think acoustic IRs are underrated and it’s nuts that there not more pedals offering them. Piezo pickups don’t sound exactly like the instrument they are attached to, and an acoustic IR doesn’t need to either. It’s just a nice alternative or addition to the piezo thing.

I think you could get away with having 5 options for a Dreadnought and 5 options for a Grand Auditorium.
 
Type an @ and then the first letters of the name. The rest can usually be autocompleted (there's a pulldown menu coming up magically in case there's multiple options for auto completion). Spaces can be used just the same as letters.
It's really only becoming difficult in case folks are using cryptic signs for their handles, such as Moondog Willy and Brockstar.
Thanks @Sascha Franck
 
Well first off, if you want him to see it, you should tag him.

Type an @ and then the first letters of the name. The rest can usually be autocompleted (there's a pulldown menu coming up magically in case there's multiple options for auto completion). Spaces can be used just the same as letters.
It's really only becoming difficult in case folks are using cryptic signs for their handles, such as Moondog Willy and Brockstar.
Thanks Sascha. I didn't know about tagging either.

@Sascha Franck
 
Yeah, this reeks of AI. Good points are made thou.
I've never used AI to write anything (I'm not even sure I would know how). I typed (and researched) this letter myself. Took me several hours.

I'm curious why the post seems like AI. Is it because it is too well written, or too poorly written? Or is it that something with a lot of info in it seems like AI?
 
I'm curious why the post seems like AI. Is it because it is too well written, or too poorly written? Or is it that something with a lot of info in it seems like AI?

Too verbose, overuse of em dashes, filler idioms ("and maybe enough by itself", "let's face it") and the itemized structure; i get way too many mails like these at work lately, to the point i'm asking people to just send me whatever prompt they used instead.

This is me being an asshole thou; as mentioned, good points overall. I don't think i've ever seen an acoustic preamp model on these devices.
 
Back
Top