These days, QC, Tonex, and NAM all do that even better. I expect Proxy will as well, but obviously it is way too soon to know. I also truly hoped a next gen Kemper profiling would offer a big step up, but seeing the MKII hardware, I am highly skeptical that they can even catch the competition let alone beat them with just a software tweak.
Not to be repetitive ..... Yes, they do THAT better, but not that much better in the majority of cases, and in no case where you could tell in a mix. Meanwhile, the EFX difference, form factor offerings, ability to customize tone, switching time, performance setup, durability, etc, etc, of the other units falls way behind.
For people that want a great bedroom toy, NAM and Tonex are just fine.
These days, QC, Tonex, and NAM all do that even better. I expect Proxy will as well, but obviously it is way too soon to know. I also truly hoped a next gen Kemper profiling would offer a big step up, but seeing the MKII hardware, I am highly skeptical that they can even catch the competition let alone beat them with just a software tweak.
I am interested in what people would consider "Kemper catching" the competition would look like and how it would be measured. FWIW, based on the continued changes to the Kemper marketing statement, I am guessing that from a strict null test analysis, Kemper will not reach NAM accuracy. I am guessing that it gets pretty close though and it will certainly be better than the MK1 algorithm was.
Now, to get off the accuracy discussion for a minute, even if MK2 hits a home run on capture accuracy, the Ui/Ux of the unit still looks like something developed in the 90's. That will still be a marketing problem for Kemper. Also, if Kemper continues to hang their marketing hat on being the most accurate, and amp reproduction as a USP, I think they will face some pretty stiff competition even from $400 devices.... which they can't win against in price.
Kemper created the capture device for live musicians. This is a great accomplishment. When it was introduced, everyone was focused on the plethora of videos and clips showing that you couldn't really tell the difference. That was a very cool marketing tool THEN. I think that Kemper should refocus to their many other strengths as "Accurate Capture" is going to be about as special as power windows soon.
I do wonder though how Kemper managed to loose control of capture technology. I suspect their patent was not done well and got too specific .... allowing others to wiggle around the edges. Dumb. Likely the most costly mistake the company has made to date.