GUIDE FOR SETTING UP YOUR ROOM

MirrorProfiles

Rock Star
Messages
3,053
Just some general advice that might be useful to those trying to get the most out of their space. I might add more in time, but it should be some helpful general advice that would apply to most people in standard rooms:

- try and set up against the shortest walls in your room. Keep things as symmetrical as possible on your left and right. 1st reflections need a lot of consideration, generally its best to have the sides as your nearest walls and the rear wall further away.

- speakers almost always want to be as close to the front wall as you can get them. Be aware of rear firing ports and heat dissipation from active monitors, although the angle of the speakers often leaves enough room for those to operate properly.

- keep the entire front wall reflective. Bass radiates in all directions at low frequencies, and to absorb in any meaningful way is going to require a lot of depth. Not going to happen. If you have the speakers close to the wall, the reflections you do get will be closer in time to the sound leaving the speaker. The speakers will also have more headroom/efficiency if they don't have absorption behind them. Put your panels in areas between you and the speakers - they'll be WAY more effective treating 1st reflections.

- measure your room, and also be aware of the axial room modes. Identifying the best positions to place your speakers AND your listening position is critical. The flattest position you can find with no treatment is likely to be your best spot even with lots of treatment. Often 38% gets mentioned online as the distance from the front wall where your best spot is likely to be. A good way to test is to place a single speaker in a front corner of the room, play some music you are familiar with, and gradually move backwards and forwards down the centre of the room. You'll notice the bass response change, and where it sounds most even is likely to be a good spot to listen from. You can measure with a mic and see if the response of the modes looks even. The goal is to avoid being in deep nulls of one or more modes. Deep nulls are commonly at 25% and 50% of the room lengths. The dimensions and construction of the room (and windows, doors etc) can affect these.

- speaker height should be determined by the acoustic centre of the speaker. Make sure the speakers are oriented the way the manufacturer intended, and often when either is possible, vertical usually performs a bit better. Use good sturdy stands (concrete blocks are ideal on a budget). Equilateral triangle for the speakers and a point a foot or so behind your head. Ideally your ear and speaker height won't be at 50% of the room height. Equal lengths can pile up issues and cause very deep nulls.

- speaker positioning should not be rushed, and may take a lot of back and forth and fine tuning. Live with it a few days and then adjust if needed. Its really so important. Be aware of boundary interferece (SBIR), which will not just come from the rear wall but all surfaces. Floor bounce is almost always going to cause a sizeable dip in the bass. There are calculators online that can help you predict/identify the frequencies at which these occur.

- 1st reflections will cause the most problems. A cloud is essential really, if you can make it deep then even better. Try and avoid having too much between the speakers and your listening spot, and the stuff that does need to be there, try and keep it symmetrical. The ceiling and floor are surfaces as much as the sides and front and rear are. Treating the floor is generally going to be out of the question, but the ceiling should allow for a good amount of absorption by using space that isn't required for anything else.

- 5cm panels aren't going to do anything for low end (where the most problems are). Neither are 10cm panels. 15-20cm panels will use the space more effectively, especially if there is an air gap. Just because a product is called a bass trap, don't assume its going to do anything for bass. Most panels sold online are not very effective. As a general rule of thumb, thinner panels are more effective with higher density insulation. As you go deeper, you'll want lower density, otherwise the insulation becomes reflective at certain frequencies and can cause comb filtering. 40kg/m3 density rockwool is good all purpose stuff, for thicker panels that are really effective for bass, fluffy fibeglass is great. If you have space for 30cm or more deep panels, you'll be able to absorb some low frequencies. Limp membrane and diaphragmatic absorbers are even more effective for low frequencies, and generally speaking, pressure based bass traps are much more effective than absorbing. GIK soffits are a pretty effective off the shelf solution, aside from your ceiling cloud you can pretty much just build a fort out of these and get good results.

- porous absorbers (what most panels and corner traps are) are velocity based. Sound has 0 velocity at surfaces, so they are more effective when they are not directly on the surface. Pressure based traps are effective where pressure is highest and velocity is lowest. Triangular corner traps aren't using your space effectively as they tend to optimise the wall surfaces and have little in the areas where velocity is higher. This is why they need to be DEEP, and ideally pressure based too (idealy targeting very specific frequencies based on your own room).

- the rear wall is going to be one of the best places to treat low modal issues. If you have room, here is a good place for deep bass traps of pink fluffy insulation (and membrane traps). The reflections from this wall can cause issues too, depending on how far away it is. Once your 1st reflections are taken care of, the rear wall is the next place to focus on.

- leaving areas reflective will make the room more pleasant to be in. Making the room overly dead just makes things weird and you wont want to spend any time in the room. Any traps you do use should be effective, lots of thin panels will just absorb high frequencies and use valuable space that could tackle the problems in the low end. High frequencies are comparatively much easier to treat than low modal stuff.

- diffusers are not going to be helpful for most people. Keep them away from monitoring, they'll distort your imaging in unpredictable and unhelpful ways - they are essentially just distorting your signal. If anywhere, at the rear of the room can be OK. Typically, they only work on a narrow band of frequencies and you can get similar results by just leaving areas reflective. Worry about those when everything else is taken care of, if needed as they arent cheap, they're big and heavy and take up room for things that might actually help.

- Whilst corrective EQ software can be very helpful, it cannot do anything for the time domain in your room. Unfortunately, the time domain is what you need to treat. Once you get your time domain under control, the frequency response will largely fix itself. Automatic correction generally brute forces itself to achieve a flat response at your listening position, with no regard for anything else. This can lead to lots of narrow EQ boosts that are reducing the headroom of your speakers, and often that won't actually help the frequency response where you are sat. Try and get your decay times in your room under control first. You're also unlikely to want a ruler flat frequency response in your room. Generally we want to have a few dB more bass with things sloping down gradually as the frequency increases. Random screenshot pulled from google images, but imagine this kind of shape:
1730374216948.png


- Chasing a flat EQ response at all costs is not advisable. Pay attention to whats going on in your room, but be aware of time doman, reflections and actually listening. Some dips will change drastically with the smallest movement of your head and won't be percievable when listening to music (they'll look worse under the mic). Always go off how things sound to you, listen and verify what you hear by measuring.
 
Last edited:
Oh and as an aside, its blows my mind how bad most people's knowledge of this stuff is even among professionals. Its so overlooked and neglected - often we set a low bar and just assume we can't improve things further. "oh my room has issues so itll never be perfect, so why bother?"

Or we assume that to do it properly is going to require hiring an expensive professional as well as a full ground up build.

In reality there is a lot we can do that costs nothing at all that can solve a lot of issues. Check through social media accounts that post studio photos - how often will you see desks and speakers positioned in odd parts of the room, no treatment at all at 1st reflections on the sides, but loads in front. Quite often these rooms are loaded full of expensive gear, even selling one or 2 of those would cover most of the costs of hiring a pro and building some effective treatment.
 
AMROC ROOM MODE CALCULTOR: https://amcoustics.com/tools/amroc

You can enter your room dimensions and it'll show you the frequencies of the modes and areas of high pressure for the associated mode in your room.

This room mode calculator is also very handy for just seeing numbers, as well as the axial spacing of the modes and the Schroeder frequency. https://www.acoustic.ua/forms/room-modes-eng.html

POROUS ABSORBER CALCULATOR: http://www.acousticmodelling.com/porous.php

Helpful for estimating the effectiveness of porous absorber panels. For materials, density and their (estimated) gas flow resistivity, this blog has some helpful values and graphs: https://www.jochenschulz.me/en/blog/rockwool-glasswool-hemp-best-absorber-material

The Arqen website has some useful information too:



As with everything on the internet, you are likely to encounter some advice that is contradictory. So much of this topic is about minimizing negatives, and often its weighing up the lesser of 2 evils. This will vary case by case on a number of factors. Some factors are measurable but others can be subjective person to person. The more you can understand, the better position you are in to balance the drawbacks and decide the best way to go.
 
Last edited:
That's be me. Thanks for posting all this. My rooms definitely not setup right, I've mostly just fitted things in where I can actually fit them.
It can be helpful to take a few steps back and just get the speakers, listening position and 1st reflection absorbers in place. You should still find plenty of room for other stuff that is practical and not too intrusive. Got to weigh up what’s important and prioritise that.

A lot of this advice is also putting a massive emphasis on listening - useful for mixing and mastering, but for recording, you may want to think about 1st reflections in those areas too.

This video has a wealth of useful advice (lots of stuff mentioned above, but for those who prefer a video/podcast format):

 
Fantastic post, thank you! I'm going to read through this a few times to let it sink in.

I've done measurements based on speaker positioning, and it's very easy to see the impact of speaker placement to the final response. From a home studio perspective, speakers that are 1-3 feet away from a wall can be an issue in bass cancelation. Having speakers close to the wall seems to reduce that issue a fair bit.

Also, having speakers too close to a desk can cause a lot of problems as well. A lot of people will either put speakers right on their desk or on a small stand, but that can cause a lot of lower midrange issues. I found raising the speakers up onto stands well above the desk cleaned up the speaker midrange quite a bit.

In a perfect world, having a larger room with the desk and seating well away from the front wall (38% distance is what I've read), and with speakers set up on stands behind the desk but several feet from the front wall, would probably fix the majority of acoustic issues. Then it comes down to treatment to reduce reflections and clean up the bass frequencies further.

It's also interesting just to move around and hear the differences. I was not happy with the low end from my speakers, but then I moved my chair back a foot and the low end filled out significantly. There's compromises of course with home spaces, but as @MirrorProfiles said, most of the stuff you can do to fix issues is basically free.
 
Killer thread, Ed! :love

I am going to take my time pouring over this, and probably not have the
time, capacity, or wherewithal to do a fucking thing. Oh well. :knit

I kid. I like my box.... and have the rest of my life to slowly improve its sonics
over time. Baby steps. :chef

Actually, was already planning on pulling everything out of it and starting from
scratch. I feel like I have most of the pieces, just need to put them in a better
arrangement. Had it set up for live use and rehearsals, but want it to be more
home studio/recording-centric and less focused on a full band setup---though
I don't want to ditch that entirely. :idk
 
I've done measurements based on speaker positioning, and it's very easy to see the impact of speaker placement to the final response. From a home studio perspective, speakers that are 1-3 feet away from a wall can be an issue in bass cancelation. Having speakers close to the wall seems to reduce that issue a fair bit.
Yep, exactly. SBIR is a big problem that leads to a noticeable dip in the low end. Further away from the wall lowers the frequency of this dip. Closer to the wall raises it up to a higher frequency. But on top of that, you get positive reinforcements too, which is why you get more low end when a speaker is close to a surface. You can use this to your advantage though. Having the low end’s timing tight is really helpful.


Also, having speakers too close to a desk can cause a lot of problems as well. A lot of people will either put speakers right on their desk or on a small stand, but that can cause a lot of lower midrange issues. I found raising the speakers up onto stands well above the desk cleaned up the speaker midrange quite a bit.
Yeah speakers on the desk has always sounded dreadful to me. There’s all kinds of sympathetic resonances that can affect both speakers and it also constrains where you can position things. Even with everything else being suboptimal, I still think having speakers on seperate (sturdy) stands is worth it.


In a perfect world, having a larger room with the desk and seating well away from the front wall (38% distance is what I've read), and with speakers set up on stands behind the desk but several feet from the front wall, would probably fix the majority of acoustic issues. Then it comes down to treatment to reduce reflections and clean up the bass frequencies further.
Yeah for sure, although it’s very room dependent. In my room 38% isn’t particularly great. I haven’t measured exactly but 20% ish is much flatter and more balanced. I have certain modes that stack up across 2 axes, so I’m assuming it’s minimising those working together a bit. 38% can also be giving up a LOT of space, so it might be acceptable in a professional environment but may be worth a trade off to have a smaller triangle in a home set up. On paper it should be a good place to start though!
 
Last edited:
Benefits of a small desk

- less reflective surfaces
- easier to position your speaker stands
- more freedom for where your computer monitor goes
- More stuff moved off to the side means less clutter, especially with cables and power supplies etc.
- in smaller rooms, having a smaller desk just gives you more space and tranquility for other stuff. Filling up a small room with a huge reflective resonant desk is usually a big trade off that aside from feeling like you’re flying a spaceship, isn’t too helpful.

It does require you to be pretty cut throat about what is essential to have on your desk. Anything that doesn’t need to be right in front of you at all times, get it out of the way.

For me, that meant my interface, patchbay, rack gear, DI, mic preamps, headphone amps, USB hubs, hard drives etc all move to the side. When I change computers that’ll move there too.
 
And that's ok. Don't let, Ed, guilt trip ya man. :beer

Is that a British thing, by the way? :idk



:rofl

Lol. It's quite a timely thread for me tbh. We're doing some decorating over the next two weeks so I'm going to be pulling my room apart to paint it. Might look at reorganising what's there and seeing what I can do with what I have. It was all very haphazardly thrown together after we moved in and never really fixed.
 
Sweet! Yeah, well-timed thread. :chef

There are always limitations to work around (time, money, space, resources), but even
little things like best possible placement of a desk and monitors is great to implement. :beer

Not going to be knocking out any walls here, like most of us, so we just have to make
the best use of the ones we have.

Oh, and colours matter. A lot! :LOL:
 
Yep, exactly. SBIR is a big problem that leads to a noticeable dip in the low end. Further away from the wall lowers the frequency of this dip. Closer to the wall raises it up to a higher frequency. But on top of that, you get positive reinforcements too, which is why you get more low end when a speaker is close to a surface. You can use this to your advantage though. Having the low end’s timing tight is really helpful.
I like that practice too, but what's positive reinforcement of low end got to do with tight low end timing?
 
I like that practice too, but what's positive reinforcement of low end got to do with tight low end timing?
They’re 2 different aspects to it (phase/timing and level). if the speaker is further away the phase between the sound coming from the speaker is more out of phase with the signal from the boundary. Having the boundary effect from the wall means the speaker is working more efficiently on the low end.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top