Tech21 goes digitalšŸ˜² Marty Friedman Signature Sansamp

Lysander

Shredder
Messages
2,371
So, apparently the new Marty Friedman signature pedal is digital - which, unless i'm crazy, is a first ever for Tech21.

I'm pretty sure it sounds great, but abandoning their analog modelling tech feels wrong somehow šŸ˜„ I always loved Sansamp DI tones.

Just as the original SansAmp was a personal mission to encapsulate tube amplifier sounds in a compact, portable pedal, Barta has long been on a quest to do the same in the digital domain. Never one to jump on a bandwagon, Barta wouldnā€™t ā€œgo digitalā€ until he found a way to replicate the dynamics, responsiveness and fluidity of its analog counterpart.

After many years, Barta ā€œcracked the code.ā€ This happened to coincide with the opportunity to collaborate with Marty Friedman. The result is the Marty Friedman Signature SansAmp.


1740180642522.png


 
Yeah I am eagerly awaiting literally anything further on it than that product page. Been following it for awhile. Nothing so far.

I am a big Marty fan though, so hopefully its good.
 
Apparently the designer hasn't tried modellers since the 90's judging by how he describes them here. :bonk

UNDER THE HOOD: CRACKING THE CODE​

As a staunch proponent of analog, Andrew Barta has never had the desire to venture into digital designs. The inventor of the SansAmp tube amplifier emulation technology, which debuted in 1989, Barta has remained loyal to the analog domain. That is, until now.

According to Barta, ā€œTo me, the main drawback of a digital modeler is the feel and the sound quality. It lacks dynamics and responsiveness. It sounds one-dimensional and it isnā€™t touch-sensitive, so the nuances of your playing style get lost. It limits your ability to change the tone by using your volume knob, picking lighter or harder. No matter how hard you hit the strings, the result is mostly the same. Thereā€™s no headroom and it doesnā€™t breathe. You are forced go to a different patch for a different tone. Ultimately, you have to conform to the device and play in a different way. So your artistic expression suffers. Artists have told me itā€™s like being in a cage. You have to wrestle harder to squeeze out the results and their fingers get really tired.

ā€œWhatever device youā€™re using, be it an amp or SansAmp or modeler, itā€™s really a part of your instrument. Your instrument actually consists of the entire signal chain, not just the guitar. Digital is just a numeric translation and isnā€™t capable of preserving the individual personality of the guitar you use. The output is pretty much the same whether itā€™s a Fender or Gibson or Ric.ā€


Just as the original SansAmp was a personal mission to encapsulate tube amplifier sounds in a compact, portable pedal, Barta has long been on a quest to do the same in the digital domain. Never one to jump on a bandwagon, Barta wouldnā€™t ā€œgo digitalā€ until he found a way to replicate the dynamics, responsiveness and fluidity of its analog counterpart.

After many years, Barta ā€œcracked the code.ā€ This happened to coincide with the opportunity to collaborate with Marty Friedman. The result is the Marty Friedman Signature SansAmp.
 
According to Barta, ā€œTo me, the main drawback of a digital modeler is the feel and the sound quality. It lacks dynamics and responsiveness. It sounds one-dimensional and it isnā€™t touch-sensitive, so the nuances of your playing style get lost. It limits your ability to change the tone by using your volume knob, picking lighter or harder. No matter how hard you hit the strings, the result is mostly the same. Thereā€™s no headroom and it doesnā€™t breathe. You are forced go to a different patch for a different tone. Ultimately, you have to conform to the device and play in a different way. So your artistic expression suffers. Artists have told me itā€™s like being in a cage. You have to wrestle harder to squeeze out the results and their fingers get really tired.
IMG_2644.gif
 
Itā€™s like hearing paul reed smith talk about tonewood

... or Paul Reed Smith talking about the "new" [original] PRS Tuning Peg Design and Shape that was so good, it was ignored for 40 years, but now makes the guitar more focused and resonant :)

why .... Why.... WHY OH LORD were we deprived for so long when the answer was there all along .............
 
Back
Top