Potential Historic Discovery at the Giza Plateau

[norminal]

Has anyone else seen this? Absolutely mind-blowing!

 

[Frodebro]

I saw something about that in my YouTube feed, I think it was Alex Jones. I needed to wind down for the night so I sidestepped that rabbit hole, but I’ll probably dive in headfirst this weekend. That kind of stuff fascinates the hell out of me.

 

[norminal]

I saw something about that in my YouTube feed, I think it was Alex Jones. I needed to wind down for the night so I sidestepped that rabbit hole, but I’ll probably dive in headfirst this weekend. That kind of stuff fascinates the hell out of me.

I’m still waiting for the people who conducted the study to present their complete findings. Apparently, that’s coming soon.

 

[FattRaxx]

This link states that it's pretty baseless, and gives a rundown....

No credible evidence supports claims of vast underground structures found beneath Egyptian pyramids

Claims of new ancient structures discovered beneath the pyramids in Giza are greatly overstated.

www.snopes.com

 

[norminal]

This link states that it's pretty baseless, and gives a rundown....

No credible evidence supports claims of vast underground structures found beneath Egyptian pyramids

Claims of new ancient structures discovered beneath the pyramids in Giza are greatly overstated.

www.snopes.com

We shall see.

 

[norminal]

I’m still being cautiously skeptical about this, but here is the conference that took place on March 16th (Italian):



Apparently the English version is coming in two days.

 

[Blix]

It's 100% bullshit. One of the authors of this "paper" is a weapons grade conspiracy nutjob.

 

[HotRats]

100% bullshit. Malanga is a well known moon landing denier and advocate for other conspiracy theories.

 

[mavrick102000]

One of the primary issues initially discussed, is that GPR (ground penetrating radar) cannot reach the depths they are stating, only capable to about 1/10 of the distance they state they can "see".

After about 200ft it's likely a computer model interpretation - not actual data.

There are very expensive methods that could get accurate data to those depths, but I doubt the Egyptian government is going to allow drilling and seismic shock to be anywhere near those structures.

 

[norminal]

 

[norminal]

One of the primary issues initially discussed, is that GPR (ground penetrating radar) cannot reach the depths they are stating, only capable to about 1/10 of the distance they state they can "see".

After about 200ft it's likely a computer model interpretation - not actual data.

There are very expensive methods that could get accurate data to those depths, but I doubt the Egyptian government is going to allow drilling and seismic shock to be anywhere near those structures.

The video I just posted breaks down how they’re using SAR.

 

[EOengineer]

This kind of thing is 200% up my alley but I was put off by the lack of any peer review. Did they actually release data?

EDIT: watched the video - still not sure what to think. The video feels psuedo-technical? I’m picking up that the “researcher” doesn’t have command of the material.

Will keep cautiously following this one.

 

[norminal]

This kind of thing is 200% up my alley but I was put off by the lack of any peer review. Did they actually release data?

EDIT: watched the video - still not sure what to think. The video feels psuedo-technical? I’m picking up that the “researcher” doesn’t have command of the material.

Will keep cautiously following this one.

The English version of the conference should land any day. I’ll be waiting for a peer review. Supposedly that’s supposed to happen? They can have all the data in the world, but if they don’t get others to verify it, then all of this means jack shit to me.

 

[EOengineer]

The English version of the conference should land any day. I’ll be waiting for a peer review. Supposedly that’s supposed to happen? They can have all the data in the world, but if they don’t get others to verify it, then all of this means jack shit to me.

Yeah this one of those frustrating instances where we expect instantaneous coalescence and of course science is going to approach slowly and with extreme skepticism as it should.

Neat if true.

 

[HotRats]

Between "we've seen somenthing with a radar" and "there's a vast underground city" there's a huge difference.
These kinds of unsubstantiated claims usually belong to pseudoscience and that's enough for me at the moment.

 

[DrewJD82]

I’m so anxious for any other info we could obtain on the history of those pyramids, but am so burnt out on “aNcIeNt TeChNolOgy” that I’m more skeptical than I’ve previously been when news pops up.

 

[mbenigni]

Scientists discover signs of ancient technology to boost ratings and click counts...

"We may never know..."

 

[Sleezy E]

Scientists

 

[JiveTurkey]

Didn't watch; just feeling saucy and wanted to gif

 

[AutomationBias]

Scientists